I’ve been an avid bowhunter since the age of 14. I would have started sooner if my dad would have let me, but honestly, I probably wasn’t ready until then. Over the last 20 years, I’ve seen some monumental changes to my favorite sport, perhaps the biggest being equipment related. I started out with a Pro-Line XLII bow with a black finish and 55 lb. maximum draw weight. I imagine that baby was pushing out a whopping 200 feet per second! I’m sure I thought it was fast then. I now shoot a Hoyt Trykon with a 70 lb. draw and more than 80% letoff. That baby sends arrows downrange at more than 300 feet per second. About the only thing about my current set-up that resembles my first one is the fact that I still use a string!
I share this story only to illustrate how far archery hunting has come in a fairly short period of time. Everything from arrows, to stands, to camo, to bows and broadheads have changed dramatically. Some would say these changes have been for the better, while others still prefer the most primitive bows and hunting accessories. Aside from equipment though, very little has changed in terms of the hunt itself. The name of the game is still to outwit the animal that you’re pursuing by putting yourself in position to get a reasonable close-range, humane and lethal shot. Once you’ve done all of that, you have to have the patience and skill to draw the bow in close presence of game, hold it steady, and release the arrow.
But what if you no longer had to draw your bow, and you could simply wait for the animal to get within your new comfortable shooting range of up to 50 yards or so, and raise a rifle-like “bow” that shoots an arrow-like bullet? What if you didn’t have to worry about holding the string back for excruciating seconds that feel like minutes when that trophy buck decides to stop behind a tree, shielding his vitals? Although this all seems far-fetched and almost like science fiction, if something like this were possible someday surely it wouldn’t be called archery hunting, would it? And regardless of the definition, there is no way that you would be allowed to use one of these new devices during archery season, right?
As unbelievable as it may sound, as of Tuesday’s Pennsylvania Game Commission Board of Commissioners’ meeting, the above paragraph is not a what if, rather a what now? In a close vote of 4-3, the board sided in favor of full-inclusion of crossbows during the regular archery season.
It’s important to clarify that I have nothing against the use of crossbows for hunting, just as I have nothing against rifles, muzzleloaders, and even handguns. In fact, my father hunts with a crossbow due to a shoulder injury he incurred a few years ago. Before that he was a pretty avid bowhunter, and I know that he’d gladly put the crossbow down in favor of his bow if he had the choice. Although I shoot both compound and traditional bows, I choose to hunt with my compound, which obviously isn’t the same level of shooting challenge offered by traditional gear. What I take issue with is the use of crossbows during the regular archery season. It’s not about potentially sharing the woods with more hunters or even about the lack of science behind the decision (although I’m certainly concerned about that).
To me, archery season has always been about the ultimate challenge of taking a deer with a bow and arrow at close range. If I failed in that endeavor, I always had the firearms season to try to fill my tags. As my wife would tell you based on our many discussions, I really struggled with settling on an opinion about crossbows in Pennsylvania, but now that it’s happened, I can clearly see what offends me about it. No matter what angle I try to see it from, I feel that including crossbows during the regular archery season has really cheapened archery hunting as I believe it should be. When I search my soul for answers, it’s that little aspect of having to draw and hold the bow in the presence of game that seems to really tear at me.
I’ve read message board after message board leading up to and now after the fateful vote, and I read everything from pure hatred to people who have accepted this change and will move on. For me, I don’t fault anyone who decides to take up crossbow hunting. That’s another hunter in the woods, and another person who may pass on the hunting tradition to someone else. I’ll continue to bowhunt, and won’t worry about what those around me are doing. However, there is only one reason I can see for full inclusion during the regular archery season, and that is money and politics. I guess that shouldn’t be a real shock to anyone at a time when Citigroup was going to use some of their federal bailout money to buy a $45 million corporate jet, but that doesn’t make it hurt any less.
As I said, I’ll move on from this and stay true to my feelings about what archery hunting truly is, but please don’t try to tell me that more than three to one opposition at the Commissioners’ meeting as well as thousands of postcards mailed to each Commissioner by concerned bowhunters made a difference. Don’t tell me that somehow the inclusion of the crossbow during the regular archery season will dramatically increase hunter numbers, and help bail the Pennsylvania Game Commission out of tough financial times. Just tell me the truth. Tell me and the other disappointed bowhunters out there that “we hear your concerns, but it’s just business, and we had a better offer.”






